Jordan Firme Business Consultants
75+ Years Combined Experience$20M+ in Penalties AvoidedTrusted by 200+ Australian Businesses5-Star Google ReviewsNationally Accredited ConsultantsSame-Day Response Guaranteed75+ Years Combined Experience$20M+ in Penalties AvoidedTrusted by 200+ Australian Businesses5-Star Google ReviewsNationally Accredited ConsultantsSame-Day Response Guaranteed

HR Management

Performance Management: Frameworks and Legal Requirements

Effective performance management is about more than annual reviews. It is a continuous process of setting expectations, providing feedback, and supporting development. When it works, it drives productivity. When it fails, it exposes you to unfair dismissal claims.

What the Law Says

While no specific law mandates a performance management framework, the Fair Work Act Section 387 requires the FWC to consider whether the employee was warned about unsatisfactory performance before dismissal. The FWC expects employers to have clear expectations, provide regular feedback, issue warnings, and give genuine opportunities to improve.

What Employers Must Do

Set clear expectations from day one

Define role responsibilities, KPIs, and behavioural standards in writing. Ensure the employee understands and acknowledges them.

Provide regular feedback

Do not wait for annual reviews. Provide ongoing feedback — both positive recognition and constructive criticism — throughout the year.

Document performance discussions

Keep written records of all performance conversations, including positive feedback, areas for improvement, and agreed actions.

Address underperformance early

Do not let issues fester. Address underperformance promptly with clear, specific feedback and agreed improvement plans.

Follow a graduated response

Informal feedback, formal warning, PIP, final warning, and then termination. Each step must be documented.

Support employee development

Provide training, resources, and mentoring to help employees meet expectations. This demonstrates good faith.

Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Mistake: Only addressing performance at annual reviews

Fix: By the time the annual review comes around, issues are entrenched. Manage performance continuously throughout the year.

Mistake: Being vague about what needs to improve

Fix: Statements like "you need to improve your attitude" are not actionable. Be specific about observable behaviours and measurable outcomes.

Mistake: Not documenting anything

Fix: Without documentation, you have no evidence. Keep written records of every performance discussion, warning, and action plan.

Mistake: Treating performance management as punishment

Fix: Performance management should be supportive and developmental. A punitive approach destroys engagement and creates legal risk.

Penalties and Consequences

Poor performance management exposes employers to unfair dismissal compensation of up to 26 weeks pay (capped at ~$87,500), reinstatement orders, legal costs of $5,000-$20,000+, and significant management time lost in FWC proceedings.

When to Get Professional Help

Jordan Firme Business Consultants develops performance management frameworks tailored to your business, including documentation templates, manager training, and hands-on support for complex situations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Best practice is continuous feedback with formal reviews at least quarterly. Annual reviews alone are insufficient for managing performance effectively and do not meet FWC expectations for timely feedback.

There is no "three strikes" rule in Australian employment law. The FWC expects a fair process proportionate to the issue. For performance, this typically means at least one formal warning and a genuine opportunity to improve. For serious misconduct, summary dismissal may be appropriate.

Generally, you should not initiate performance management processes while an employee is on leave. However, you can note performance issues that occurred before the leave and address them when the employee returns.

Performance management addresses capability — the employee cannot meet expectations despite effort. Disciplinary action addresses conduct — the employee chooses to behave inappropriately. The distinction matters because the process and approach differ.

Not necessarily. Minor performance issues may be resolved through informal coaching and feedback. A formal PIP is appropriate when informal approaches have not worked or when the performance gap is significant.

Need Performance Management Help?

Our HR consultants develop performance management frameworks and provide hands-on support for complex situations.

Book a Consultation
Book Free Consultation